Key Case Facts
- Case Number: D2026-1390
- Contested Domain:
nexon-partners.com - Verdict: Transfer Ordered
NXC Corp., the holding company for the global gaming brand Nexon, initiated a UDRP proceeding against Herr Jacobi Andreas and Andreas Jacobi Freiberuf to address the registration of the domain name <nexon-partners.com>. The Complainant asserted that the registration was unauthorized and leveraged the significant global reputation of their mark to create a false impression of a business affiliation. By combining the distinctive corporate name with a term implying a professional relationship, the registration posed a direct threat to the integrity of the brand’s official partner communications.
The Basis for the Transfer
I. The domain name prominently features the trademark of the Complainant in its entirety. The addition of the suffix “partners” does not diminish the recognition of the core brand; instead, it strengthens the likelihood that an internet user would believe the website is an official extension of the Complainant’s business network. Because the trademark is internationally recognized in the gaming and technology sectors, the brand remains the dominant and most identifiable element of the URL.
II. No evidence was presented to suggest that the Respondent has any authorization, license, or legal connection to NXC Corp. or its subsidiaries. The Respondent is not known by the name “Nexon” in any commercial capacity, nor was there any proof of a non-commercial or fair use of the domain. The absence of a legitimate business setup or a verifiable intent to use the name for a bona fide offering supports the conclusion that the registration lacked a valid justification.
III. The circumstances surrounding the registration indicate that the Respondent was aware of the Complainant’s market presence. The choice of a domain that specifically mimics a corporate partnership portal suggests an intent to divert web traffic by exploiting the reputation of the established mark. Such actions create an environment where users may be misled into believing they are interacting with an authorized representative of the brand, which disrupts the Complainant’s ability to control its professional image online.
Safeguarding Corporate Identity Online
This case serves as a critical reminder for companies to monitor for “look-alike” domains that incorporate their brand alongside industry-specific terms. Variations like “partners,” “affiliates,” or “vendors” are frequently used by third parties to create deceptive platforms that can be used for phishing or to dilute brand equity. To maintain a secure digital ecosystem, businesses must proactively identify these registrations and utilize dispute resolution mechanisms to reclaim domains that falsely imply a corporate connection.
If you are dealing with unauthorized domain registrations that mimic your corporate structure, the ClaimOn team can assist you in developing an enforcement strategy to reclaim your assets and secure your brand’s digital perimeter.



