Contacts
Home - UDRP Cases - Phishing and Email Fraud

Phishing and Email Fraud

UDRP tactic
Mitigating Corporate Impersonation Risks: American Airlines Domain Case Study
27 September, 2026 · D2026-3564
Mitigating Corporate Impersonation Risks: American Airlines Domain Case Study
Analysis of the American Airlines UDRP case regarding employeesamericanairlines.com and the business risks of internal phishing and brand impersonation.
employeesamericanairlines.com
Transfer
Defending Against Domain-Based Email Impersonation Risks
25 September, 2026 · D2026-3315
Defending Against Domain-Based Email Impersonation Risks
Analysis of WIPO case D2026-3315 regarding the use of neastrategic.com for investment fraud and executive impersonation.
neastrategic.com
Transfer
Combating Corporate Impersonation and Recruitment Fraud in Domain Disputes
25 September, 2026 · D2026-3356
Combating Corporate Impersonation and Recruitment Fraud in Domain Disputes
Analysis of WIPO case D2026-3356 regarding the fraudulent use of typosquatted domains for recruitment scams and phishing.
perellaweinbergpartner.com
Transfer
Protecting Employer Brand Against Phishing Domain Attacks
21 September, 2026 · D2026-3013
Protecting Employer Brand Against Phishing Domain Attacks
Analysis of Starbucks Corporation's successful WIPO UDRP case against career-themed phishing domains and strategies to improve corporate brand protection.
starbuckscareerpilot.com (+ 4 more)
Transfer
Defending Against Corporate Impersonation and Email Fraud: The Goya Foods Case
21 September, 2026 · D2026-3499
Defending Against Corporate Impersonation and Email Fraud: The Goya Foods Case
Analyze WIPO case D2026-3499 where Goya Foods secured the transfer of a domain used for high-value procurement fraud and employee impersonation.
goyaservice.com
Transfer
Defending against phishing via domain impersonation: Principal Financial Services
21 September, 2026 · D2026-3783
Defending against phishing via domain impersonation: Principal Financial Services
Analyze the UDRP case D2026-3783 where Principal Financial Services successfully transferred a phishing domain impersonating their client portal.
principal-clientgroup-portal.com
Transfer
Preventing Domain-Based Corporate Impersonation: Lessons from D2026-3336
19 September, 2026 · D2026-3336
Preventing Domain-Based Corporate Impersonation: Lessons from D2026-3336
Analysis of the WIPO UDRP case D2026-3336, where a respondent used the domain burda-media.com to conduct email phishing and corporate identity fraud against business partners.
burda-media.com
Transfer
Addressing Recruitment Fraud and Impersonation in Domain Disputes: Lessons from Emory Healthcare
19 September, 2026 · D2026-3425
Addressing Recruitment Fraud and Impersonation in Domain Disputes: Lessons from Emory Healthcare
Analyze the WIPO transfer decision D2026-3425 for emoryhealthcare.team, focusing on employee impersonation and phishing tactics used to exploit medical brand identity.
emoryhealthcare.team
Transfer
Protecting Brand Identity Against Email Fraud and Passive Domain Holding
18 September, 2026 · D2026-3287
Protecting Brand Identity Against Email Fraud and Passive Domain Holding
Analysis of WIPO case D2026-3287 where Iveco S.p.A. recovered ivecogrupo.com after discovering suspicious MX/SPF records suggesting phishing intent.
ivecogrupo.com
Transfer
Addressing Phishing and Typosquatting in Super-Pharm Trademark Disputes
18 September, 2026 · D2026-3310
Addressing Phishing and Typosquatting in Super-Pharm Trademark Disputes
Analysis of WIPO case D2026-3310 involving Super-Pharm; learn how to identify phishing risks and combat typosquatting through proactive domain enforcement.
superpharmaph.cfd (+ 2 more)
Transfer
Securing Brand Trust: Mitigating Phishing Risks via Domain Enforcement
18 September, 2026 · D2026-3226
Securing Brand Trust: Mitigating Phishing Risks via Domain Enforcement
Analyze the D2026-3226 UDRP case where lawyerskpmginternational.com was used to impersonate KPMG in a phishing scam, highlighting risks to customer trust.
lawyerskpmginternational.com
Transfer
Addressing Email Interception Tactics in Trademark Disputes
17 September, 2026 · D2026-3059
Addressing Email Interception Tactics in Trademark Disputes
Analysis of McDonald’s UDRP success against rmhcseattle.com and how to defend against domains used for corporate email interception.
rmhcseattle.com
Transfer
1 2 3 4 5 … 14
All UDRP Cases Brand Plus Keyword Corporate Impersonation Fake Stores Geographic Mimicry Mixed Threat Passive Holding Phishing and Email Fraud Ransom or Resale Traffic Diversion Typo Domains
Get Expert UDRP & Domain Dispute Assistance
Request a confidential case evaluation from our domain dispute attorneys. We will review your domain situation and reply within 24 hours.

    Thank You for Your Request!
    Our legal team is reviewing your dispute details and will contact you via email shortly.
    Image
    This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By continuing, you agree to our Privacy Policy.
    Privacy settings

    When you visit websites, they may store or retrieve data in your browser. This storage is often required for basic website functionality. Storage may be used for marketing, analytics and site personalization purposes, such as storing your preferences. Privacy is important to us, so you can disable certain types of storage that may not be necessary for the basic functioning of the website. Blocking categories may affect the performance of the website.

    Manage settings

    Necessary
    Always active

    These cookies are necessary for the website to function and cannot be disabled in our systems. They are usually only set in response to actions you take that constitute a request for services, such as adjusting your privacy settings, logging in, or filling out forms. You can set your browser to block these cookies or notify you about them, but some parts of the site will not work. These cookies do not store any personal information.

    Marketing

    These elements are used to show you advertising that is more relevant to you and your interests. They can also be used to limit the number of ad views and measure the effectiveness of advertising campaigns. Advertising networks usually place them with the permission of the site operator.

    Personalization

    These elements allow the website to remember your choices (such as your username, language or region you are in) and provide enhanced, more personalized features. For example, a website may provide you with local weather forecasts or traffic news by storing data about your current location.

    Analytics

    These elements help the website operator understand how their website works, how visitors interact with the site and whether there may be technical problems. This type of storage usually does not collect information that identifies the visitor.